My blog on why the DNC should donate $250 million to the Huntsman for president campaign set a record for retweets and blog reads. One direct response from liberal-somebody called me a "liar," with no explanation. I left this comment in the crazy basket.
Let me milk this DNC notion a little more. Most people understood that my thoughts were a bit "tongue in cheek", and although I never really understood that analogy, it seems to fit this situation. Of course, the DNC believes that Huntsman is the weakest of the republican presidential candidates and therefore would be the easiest for Obama to beat.
Let me milk this DNC notion a little more. Most people understood that my thoughts were a bit "tongue in cheek", and although I never really understood that analogy, it seems to fit this situation. Of course, the DNC believes that Huntsman is the weakest of the republican presidential candidates and therefore would be the easiest for Obama to beat.
And that belief is the big difference between the DNC and the Huntsman campaign. Huntsman is running on his resume, a new and innovative campaign notion. In stark contrast, the DNC genuinely believes that the candidate with the most money wins, regardless of resume, experience or track record. They must believe it, or other wise they would not support Obama for reelection.
Obama's track record is disastrous and his resume is weak, particularly his poor white house performance. The DNC believe the American people are not smart enough to vote on the facts, rather they vote on the most advertising views, which translates into dollars. Call me an American and a republican, but I believe a country, that can put a man on the moon and win a world war or two, is smart enough remove Obama and give someone else a chance.
Obama's track record is disastrous and his resume is weak, particularly his poor white house performance. The DNC believe the American people are not smart enough to vote on the facts, rather they vote on the most advertising views, which translates into dollars. Call me an American and a republican, but I believe a country, that can put a man on the moon and win a world war or two, is smart enough remove Obama and give someone else a chance.
The DNC prefers to pit Obama against Huntsman because they believe they can put Obama's Harvard education against Huntsman's modest college experience. Whoa Nellie? Did not the billionaire founders of Microsoft and Facebook drop out of college, and were they not enrolled in Harvard? Yes, they did and they did alright too without the mandatory semester of Spanish. Mr. webtalkwithbob are there other billionaire college drop outs? Yes, there are: Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Steve Jobs, Ralph Lauren, Sir Richard Branson and Larry Ellison too name a few. If you do not recognize these names, google them to validate me. These people are genuine job creators.
I need to be careful with what I say because if I make my case for Huntsman too strong, the DNC may decide they would be a lot happier with supporting Romney.
Join me in my fire Obama campaign and put the best resume in the white house.
No comments:
Post a Comment